What is better for an IP transfer agreement or an intellectual property license? The reality is that there are pros and cons to each choice, depending on your needs and interests. Most of the time, IP holders want to keep control of their intellectual property and opt for intellectual property licensing. This is an advantage because you can determine how your IP address is used and change partners if a partnership is not beneficial. In addition, the granting of intellectual property licenses allows you to obtain a constant income from your IP for a period of time and to confer the same rights to multiple users. Under Article 27 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, “everyone is entitled to the protection of moral and material interests arising from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which it is the author.”  Although the relationship between intellectual property and human rights is complex, there are moral arguments in favour of intellectual property. Since you have the right to transfer your intellectual property rights to other parties, IP agreements can take one of two fundamental forms: transfer agreements and IP licensing agreements. Overall, the weight of existing historical evidence indicates that patent policies, which confer strong intellectual property rights on early generations of inventors, may discourage innovation. On the contrary, policies that promote the dissemination of ideas and amend patent legislation to facilitate market entry and competition can be an effective mechanism for promoting innovation.  Criticism of the concept of intellectual property ranges from the discussion of its indeterminacy and abstract overcoming to direct controversies about the semantic validity of the use of words such as property and rights in modes, which are contrary to practice and law. Many critics argue that this concept specifically serves the curriculum of parties who oppose reforms in the public interest or any other related legislation; and that it prohibits intelligent debate on specific and often unrelated aspects of copyright, patents, trademarks, etc.  Be open-minded when thinking about the types of intellectual property that might be applicable to the protection of your invention.
These exclusive rights allow intellectual property owners to benefit from the property they have created, which provides a financial incentive to make an investment in intellectual property and, in the case of patents, supports the associated research and development costs.  In the United States, Article 8, paragraph 8, of the Constitution is commonly referred to as the patent and copyright clause; “Congress will have the power to promote the advancement of science and the useful arts by ensuring that authors and inventors have exclusive rights to their respective writings and discoveries for a limited period of time.”  “Some commentators, such as David Levine and Michele Boldrin, dispute this justification.  IPAG is a project of the “Universities of Austria”, supported by the National Contact Point for Intellectual Property (ncp.ip) of the Federal Ministry of Science and Research (BMWF), the Federal Ministry of Economy, Family and Youth (BMWFJ), the Federal Ministry of Transport, Innovation and Technology.